#78432On Sunday, April 06, 2008Guest (not verified) said,
Well, there's more to it than simply saving landlords money.
You see, any time an apartment gets broken into, burns down, has a pipe burst, etc., tenants assume that their landlord's insurance will pay them for their loss.
It doesn't.
By requiring renters to have their own coverage, landlords are making sure that they never have to get into a protracted argument with a distraught tenant about what the landlord's policy does and does not coverage.
Really, all renters should carry insurance coverage, whether or not it is mandatory. You wouldn't drive a car uninsured, would you?
Add new comment
Well, there's more to it
Well, there's more to it than simply saving landlords money.
You see, any time an apartment gets broken into, burns down, has a pipe burst, etc., tenants assume that their landlord's insurance will pay them for their loss.
It doesn't.
By requiring renters to have their own coverage, landlords are making sure that they never have to get into a protracted argument with a distraught tenant about what the landlord's policy does and does not coverage.
Really, all renters should carry insurance coverage, whether or not it is mandatory. You wouldn't drive a car uninsured, would you?
Reply
Topics
Decorating
Finding an Apartment
Gardening
Health & Safety
Help Me Now!
Legal Issues
Moving
Neighbors
Pets
Renters Insurance
Renters Resources
Roommates
Saving Money
Small Space Ideas
Sites for Renters
Blogosphere
del.icio.usdel.icio.us feed